EXPLORING PHONOLOGY AND SIGN LANGUAGE AS CATALYSTS IN MODERN COMMUNICATION

Main Article Content

Dr. Monika Jakhar

Abstract

Phonology, focusing on the sounds of spoken language, forms the bedrock of oral communication and intertwines with technology, while sign language, a visual-gestural medium, champions inclusivity for the Deaf community. This symbiotic relationship not only enhances our understanding of linguistic diversity but also shapes a more interconnected and inclusive global dialogue, breaking down barriers and fostering a dynamic and enriched communication landscape. The articulators of sign language are the visible and moveable portions of the body, including the hands, face, head, and upper torso. These articulators are responsible for conveying prosody, as well as for shaping, restricting, and contrasting words. An introduction to the structure of phonology in the non-verbal language of sign language is given in this article.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Jakhar, D. M. (2020). EXPLORING PHONOLOGY AND SIGN LANGUAGE AS CATALYSTS IN MODERN COMMUNICATION. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 11(2), 726–734. https://doi.org/10.61841/turcomat.v11i2.14344
Section
Articles

References

. Arbib, Michael. (2013). Précis of How the brain got language: The Mirror System Hypothesis. 2013. 5.

1515/langcog-2013-0007.

. Berent, Gerald. (2013). Sign Language-Spoken Language Bilingualism and the Derivation of

Bimodally Mixed Sentences. 10.1002/9781118332382.ch14.

. Cormier, Kearsy & Smith, Sandra. (2008). Acquisition of perspective and role shift in deaf children:

Evidence from British Sign Language.

. Guha, R. (2007) India After Gandhi: The History of the World’s Largest Democracy (London:

Macmillan).

. Jenks, M. & Dempsey, N. (2007) Defining the neighbourhood: challenges for empirical research,

TownPlanning Review, 78(2), pp. 153–177

. Kraus, Nina & Slater, Jessica. (2015). Beyond Words: How Humans Communicate Through Sound.

Annual review of psychology. 67. 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033318.

. Raman, S. (2010) Designing a liveable compact city: physical forms of city and social life in

urbanneighbourhoods, Built Environment, 36(1), pp. 63–80.

. Robinson, D. (2005) The search for community cohesion: key themes and dominant concepts of

thepublic policy agenda, Urban Studies, 42(8), pp. 1411– 1427.

. Sandler, Wendy & Lillo-Martin, Diane. (2006). Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Sign

Language and Linguistic Universals. 1-547. 10.1017/CBO9781139163910.

. Vaughan, L. (2007) The spatial foundations of community construction: the future of

pluralism inBritain’s ‘multi-cultural’ society, Global Built Environment Review, 6(2), pp. 3– 17.

. Whynot, Lori. (2015). Assessing comprehension of International Sign lectures: linguistic and

sociolinguistic factors. 10.13140/RG.2.2.15079.78243.

. Wildgen, Wolfgang. (2007). Semiotic Hypercycles Driving the Evolution of Language.

Axiomathes. 18. 91-116. 10.1007/s10516-007-9020-1.