EXPLORING PHONOLOGY AND SIGN LANGUAGE AS CATALYSTS IN MODERN COMMUNICATION
Main Article Content
Abstract
Phonology, focusing on the sounds of spoken language, forms the bedrock of oral communication and intertwines with technology, while sign language, a visual-gestural medium, champions inclusivity for the Deaf community. This symbiotic relationship not only enhances our understanding of linguistic diversity but also shapes a more interconnected and inclusive global dialogue, breaking down barriers and fostering a dynamic and enriched communication landscape. The articulators of sign language are the visible and moveable portions of the body, including the hands, face, head, and upper torso. These articulators are responsible for conveying prosody, as well as for shaping, restricting, and contrasting words. An introduction to the structure of phonology in the non-verbal language of sign language is given in this article.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
References
. Arbib, Michael. (2013). Précis of How the brain got language: The Mirror System Hypothesis. 2013. 5.
1515/langcog-2013-0007.
. Berent, Gerald. (2013). Sign Language-Spoken Language Bilingualism and the Derivation of
Bimodally Mixed Sentences. 10.1002/9781118332382.ch14.
. Cormier, Kearsy & Smith, Sandra. (2008). Acquisition of perspective and role shift in deaf children:
Evidence from British Sign Language.
. Guha, R. (2007) India After Gandhi: The History of the World’s Largest Democracy (London:
Macmillan).
. Jenks, M. & Dempsey, N. (2007) Defining the neighbourhood: challenges for empirical research,
TownPlanning Review, 78(2), pp. 153–177
. Kraus, Nina & Slater, Jessica. (2015). Beyond Words: How Humans Communicate Through Sound.
Annual review of psychology. 67. 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033318.
. Raman, S. (2010) Designing a liveable compact city: physical forms of city and social life in
urbanneighbourhoods, Built Environment, 36(1), pp. 63–80.
. Robinson, D. (2005) The search for community cohesion: key themes and dominant concepts of
thepublic policy agenda, Urban Studies, 42(8), pp. 1411– 1427.
. Sandler, Wendy & Lillo-Martin, Diane. (2006). Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Sign
Language and Linguistic Universals. 1-547. 10.1017/CBO9781139163910.
. Vaughan, L. (2007) The spatial foundations of community construction: the future of
pluralism inBritain’s ‘multi-cultural’ society, Global Built Environment Review, 6(2), pp. 3– 17.
. Whynot, Lori. (2015). Assessing comprehension of International Sign lectures: linguistic and
sociolinguistic factors. 10.13140/RG.2.2.15079.78243.
. Wildgen, Wolfgang. (2007). Semiotic Hypercycles Driving the Evolution of Language.
Axiomathes. 18. 91-116. 10.1007/s10516-007-9020-1.