A TIME FREQUENCY BASED SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY DETECTION FOR ANTIMONEY LAUNDERING
Main Article Content
Abstract
Money laundering is the crucial mechanism utilized by criminals to inject proceeds of crime into the financial system. The primary responsibility of the detection of suspicious activity related to money laundering is with the financial institutions. Most of the current systems in these institutions are rule-based and ineffective (over 90 % false positives). The available data science-based anti-money laundering (AML) models to replace the existing rule-based systems work on customer relationship management (CRM) features and time characteristics of transaction behaviour. Due to thousands of possible account features, customer features, and their combinations, it is challenging to perform feature engineering to achieve reasonable accuracy. Aiming to improve the detection performance of suspicious transaction monitoring systems for AML systems, in this article, we introduce a novel feature set based on time-frequency analysis, that uses 2-D representations of financial transactions. Random forest is utilized as a machine learning method, and simulated annealing is adopted for hyperparameter tuning. The designed algorithm is tested on real banking data, proving the results’ efficacy in practically relevant environments. It is shown that the time-frequency characteristics are discriminatory features for suspicious and non-suspicious entities. Therefore, these features substantially improve the area under curve results (over 1%) of the existing data science-based transaction monitoring systems. Using time-frequency features alone, a false positive rate of 14.9% has been achieved, with an F-score of 59.05%. When combined with transaction and CRM features, the false positive rate is 11.85%, and the F-Score is improved to 74.06%.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
References
T. Sausen and A. Liegel, ‘‘AI in AML: The shift is underway,’’ NICE Actimize, Hoboken, NJ, USA, Tech.
Rep., Jan. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.niceactimize.com/Documents/aml_ai_in_aml_insights_report.pdf
Estimating Illicit Financial Flows Resulting From Drug Trafficking and Other Transnational Organized Crimes,
U. N. O. Drugs and Crime, Vienna, Austria, 2011.
J. Gao, Z. Zhou, J. Ai, B. Xia, and S. Coggeshall, ‘‘Predicting credit card transaction fraud using machine
learning algorithms,’’ J. Intell. Learn. Syst. Appl., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 33–63, 2019.
Y. Bengio, A. Courville, and P. Vincent, ‘‘Representation learning: A review and new perspectives,’’ IEEE
Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1798–1828, Aug. 2013.
J. Heaton, ‘‘An empirical analysis of feature engineering for predictive modeling,’’ in Proc. SoutheastCon, Mar.
, pp. 1–6.
A. Coates, A. Ng, and H. Lee, ‘‘An analysis of single-layer networks in unsupervised feature learning,’’ in Proc.
th Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. Statist., JMLR Workshop Conf., 2011, pp. 215–223.
R. C. Watkins, K. M. Reynolds, R. Demara, M. Georgiopoulos, A. Gonzalez, and R. Eaglin, ‘‘Tracking dirty
proceeds: Exploring data mining technologies as tools to investigate money laundering,’’ Police Pract. Res., vol. 4,
no. 2, pp. 163–178, Jun. 2003.
T. E. Senator, H. G. Goldberg, J. Wooton, M. A. Cottini, A. U. Khan, C. D. Klinger, W. M. Llamas, M. P.
Marrone, and R. W. Wong, ‘‘Financial crimes enforcement network AI system (FAIS) identifying potential money
laundering from reports of large cash transactions,’’ AI Mag., vol. 16, no. 4, p. 21, 1995.
J. S. Zdanowicz, ‘‘Detecting money laundering and terrorist financing via data mining,’’ Commun. ACM, vol.
, no. 5, pp. 53–55, May 2004.
T. Zhu, ‘‘An outlier detection model based on cross datasets comparison for financial surveillance,’’ in Proc.
IEEE Asia–Pacific Conf. Services Comput. (APSCC), Dec. 2006, pp. 601–604.