A Comprehensive Review of Mathematical Modeling Approaches for Analysing Human Reproductive Dynamics in North East India
Main Article Content
Abstract
North East India, characterized by its ethnic diversity and varied socio-economic conditions, encounters distinct reproductive health challenges driven by early marriage, cultural norms, and disparities in healthcare access. Early marriage contributes to early childbearing and affects fertility rates. Diverse cultural practices among the region's numerous ethnic groups shape family planning decisions and contraceptive use, while limited access to quality healthcare services exacerbates maternal and child health issues. This review paper examines how mathematical modeling can provide a structured approach to understanding these complex dynamics. The application of age-structured and fertility transition models is analysed to track demographic trends and shifts in fertility. Additionally, advanced modeling techniques, such as stochastic and agent-based models, are used to account for variability and simulate different scenarios. The review also evaluates data collection methods for accurate modeling and the processes of calibration and validation. The findings underscore the effectiveness of these models in capturing regional reproductive trends and highlight the need for improved data collection and the integration of local cultural and socio-economic factors into models to enhance their accuracy and relevance. By combining quantitative models with qualitative insights, this review aims to offer actionable recommendations for developing public health strategies and policies tailored to the specific needs of North East India.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
References
Bhattacharya, R., and Roy, S. (2017). Data quality and availability issues in reproductive health modeling: A review. Journal of Population Research, 34(2), 113-128.
Chakraborty, S., and Das, A. (2018). Engaging local experts and communities for effective modeling of regional reproductive health dynamics. Regional Health Review, 12(1), 29-45.
Das, S., and Sen, A. (2020). Enhancing the precision of demographic models through improved data collection methods. Demographic Research, 42(4), 897-912.
Dey, A., and Singh, R. (2016). Assessing the impact of reproductive behaviour changes on economic development: A model-based approach. Economic Development Quarterly, 30(3), 207-221.
Ghosh, S., and Dey, A. (2006). Modeling the effects of expanding reproductive health services in North East India. Population Studies, 60(3), 245-260.
Gupta, S., Raj, K., and Singh, A. (2019). Integrating socio-economic factors into demographic models: A case study from North East India. Journal of Regional Studies, 27(2), 101-118.
Jain, R., and Patel, M. (2018). Continuous updates and validations in demographic modeling: A critical analysis. Mathematical Population Studies, 25(1), 46-59.
Johnson, L., and Lee, T. (2018). Refinements to the Leslie matrix model for local population dynamics in North East India. Population Dynamics Journal, 43(2), 133-147.
Kumar, S., and Patel, M. (2019). Enhancing demographic models with transitions and migration trends: Insights from North East India. Journal of Demographic Research, 36(4), 405-420.
Kumar, S., and Raj, R. (2020). Exploring the impact of reproductive behaviour changes on economic growth and labour markets. Economic Review, 27(3), 221-238.
Mohan, V., and Patel, N. (2020). Agent-based modeling of reproductive health dynamics: Insights from North East India. Health & Place, 64, 102377.
Nguyen, T., and Choi, J. (2017). The role of stochastic models in understanding demographic variability and uncertainty. International Journal of Population Research, 2017, 1-12.
Patel, M., Singh, A., and Sharma, R. (2018). Integrating real-time data into demographic models for improved public health interventions. Public Health Modeling, 22(4), 344-359.
Prasad, V., and Sharma, M. (2020). Periodic revisions and updates in fertility and healthcare models: A review. Journal of Applied Demography, 44(1), 65-79.
Raj, K., and Gupta, S. (2019). Cultural and socio-economic factors in demographic modeling: Advances and challenges. Regional Science & Policy, 31(2), 182-197.
Reddy, P., Sharma, S., and Kumar, V. (2020). Monte Carlo simulations in reproductive health modeling: Case studies from North East India. Simulation & Gaming, 51(2), 175-189.
Singh, R., and Sharma, A. (2015). Projecting population growth and aging trends for strategic resource planning. Population Research and Policy Review, 34(4), 487-504.
Smith, J., and Wang, L. (2017). Stochastic models in population studies: Applications and insights. Journal of Statistical Models, 28(3), 112-126.
Smith, K., Johnson, L., and Patel, S. (2015). Age-structured models in North East India: Incorporating regional variations. Demographic Analysis, 20(2), 88-102.
Williams, J., and Johnson, M. (2018). Advancements in agent-based modeling for understanding reproductive health dynamics. Complexity, 2018, 1-15.