REMAINING USEFUL LIFE PREDICTOR FOR EV BATTERIES USING MACHINE LEARNING
Main Article Content
Abstract
Electric vehicles (EVs) are a key solution to combat rising carbon emissions and reduce dependence on fossil fuels. In India, the government has implemented policies such as the Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Hybrid and Electric Vehicles (FAME) scheme to promote EV adoption Predicting the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of EV batteries using machine learning ensures better battery health management and enhances operational efficiency. Applications include EV fleet management, battery recycling, and cost-effective maintenance. To develop a machine learning model that accurately predicts the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of EV batteries to improve operational reliability, reduce maintenance costs, and support sustainable energy practices. Before the advent of machine learning, traditional methods for estimating EV battery life relied on rule-based approaches, where predefined thresholds such as voltage drops or charge cycles were used to predict battery health. Empirical models, often linear, were developed based on historical performance data but lacked the ability to adapt to dynamic usage patterns. Additionally, manual battery testing was a common practice to measure degradation, though it was time-consuming, labor-intensive, and often prone to inaccuracies in capturing the complex nature of battery aging. Traditional systems for predicting EV battery life are largely empirical and rely on static models that fail to capture dynamic battery behavior. These methods often lack precision, are labor-intensive, and provide limited adaptability to varying usage conditions, leading to inefficiencies in battery management. The increasing demand for EVs and their critical dependence on battery performance drives the need for accurate RUL prediction systems. Traditional methods are insufficient in addressing the complex, non-linear nature of battery degradation. The proposed machine learning-based system leverages real-time battery performance data, including metrics like voltage, current, temperature, and charge-discharge cycles, to train predictive models capable of estimating the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of EV batteries. This approach significantly enhances accuracy by capturing complex patterns in battery degradation, enables real-time predictions for immediate insights, optimizes costs by minimizing unnecessary replacements and maximizing resource utilization, and promotes sustainability through efficient recycling and reduced battery waste.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
References
Y. Gao, X. Zhang, B. Guo, C. Zhu, J. Wiedemann, L. Wang, and J. Cao, ‘‘Health-aware multiobjective optimal charging strategy with coupled electrochemical-thermal-aging model for lithium-ion battery,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 3417–3429, May 2020.
J. Peng, Z. Zhou, J. Wang, D. Wu, and Y. Guo, ‘‘Residual remaining useful life prediction method for lithium-ion batteries in satellite with incomplete healthy historical data,’’ IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 127788–127799, 2019.
H. Gabbar, A. Othman, and M. Abdussami, ‘‘Review of battery management systems (BMS) development and industrial standards,’’ Technologies, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 28, Apr. 2021.
Y. Xing, E. W. M. Ma, K. L. Tsui, and M. Pecht, ‘‘Battery management systems in electric and hybrid vehicles,’’ Energies, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 1840–1857, 2011.
S. Jinlei, P. Lei, L. Ruihang, M. Qian, T. Chuanyu, and W. Tianru, ‘‘Economic operation optimization for 2nd use batteries in battery energy storage systems,’’ IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 41852–41859, 2019.
K. Liu, X. Hu, Z. Wei, Y. Li, and Y. Jiang, ‘‘Modified Gaussian process regression models for cyclic capacity prediction of lithium-ion batteries,’’ IEEE Trans. Transport. Electrific., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1225–1236, Dec. 2019.
C. She, Z. Wang, F. Sun, P. Liu, and L. Zhang, ‘‘Battery aging assessment for real-world electric buses based on incremental capacity analysis and radial basis function neural network,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 3345–3354, May 2020.
B. Xu, J. Zhao, T. Zheng, E. Litvinov, and D. S. Kirschen, ‘‘Factoring the cycle aging cost of batteries participating in electricity markets,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 2248–2259, Mar. 2018. [9] N. Qi, K. Dai, F. Yi, X. Wang, Z. You, and J. Zhao, ‘‘An adaptive energy management strategy to extend battery lifetime of solar powered wireless sensor nodes,’’ IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 88289–88300, 2019.
C. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Gao, F. Wang, B. Mu, and W. Zhang, ‘‘Accelerated fading recognition for lithium-ion batteries with nickel-cobalt-manganese cathode using quantile regression method,’’ Appl. Energy, vol. 256, Dec. 2019, Art. no. 113841.
H. Liu, F. Chen, Y. Tong, Z. Wang, X. Yu, and R. Huang, ‘‘Impacts of driving conditions on EV battery pack life cycle,’’ World Electr. Vehicle J., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 17, Feb. 2020.
M. Corno and G. Pozzato, ‘‘Active adaptive battery aging management for electric vehicles,’’ IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 258–269, Jan. 2020.
K. Liu, Y. Li, X. Hu, M. Lucu, and W. D. Widanage, ‘‘Gaussian process regression with automatic relevance determination kernel for calendar aging prediction of lithium-ion batteries,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 3767–3777, Jun. 2020.
J. Ma, S. Xu, P. Shang, Y. Ding, W. Qin, Y. Cheng, C. Lu, Y. Su, J. Chong, H. Jin, and Y. Lin, ‘‘Cycle life test optimization for different Li-ion power battery formulations using a hybrid remaining-useful-life prediction method,’’ Appl. Energy, vol. 262, Mar. 2020, Art. no. 114490.
M. Behdad Jamshidi, M. Jamshidi, and S. Rostami, ‘‘An intelligent approach for nonlinear system identification of a Li-ion battery,’’ in Proc. IEEE 2nd Int. Conf. Autom. Control Intell. Syst. (I2CACIS), Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, Oct. 2017, pp. 98–103.