The Perspectives of Faculty Members about faculty educational evaluation, a case study in Zabol University of Medical Sciences
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Higher education has a fundamental and pivotal role in the development of societies. The main elements in the university include professors, students and the educational environment. In this research, we seek to examine the Perspectives of faculty members on the evaluation of professors.
Methods: This is a cross-sectional descriptive case study. The research tool is faculty evaluation questionnaires that were used in zbmu. content validity method was used for validity of the questionnaire, and the reliability was 0.88 by Cronbach's alpha method. The population of the study was 125 people of faculty members of zbmu who entered the research by census method.for analyze the data, descriptive statistics was used.
Results: Based on the findings, 83.7% of the professors agree that administrators evaluate faculty. Colleague with 67.4% and students with 55.4% were in the next ranks. Promotion rank with 85.9%, and annual promotion with 75% was the evaluation objectives. Mastery of scientific topics and knowledge, educational and research counseling, physical attendance in classes and answer to students' problems were accepted from the student, group leader, colleague and vice chancellor, respectively.
Conclusion: The educational evaluation of faculty members has complexities and is challenging. According to professors, each source of information in a particular field is more worthy of comment. It seems that the use of several resources will be able to better evaluate the educational activities of faculty members.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
