"Composable BPM: Modularizing Workflows for Agility and Efficiency"
Main Article Content
Abstract
Composable Business Process Management (BPM) architecture represents a significant evolution in process design, introducing modularity and adaptability to business workflows. By enabling organizations to break down complex business processes into smaller, reusable components, composable BPM offers a high level of agility, allowing businesses to reconfigure workflows quickly in response to changing market demands. This research explores how Pega, a leading BPM platform, has facilitated composable processes for businesses, empowering them to streamline operations, improve efficiency, and enhance flexibility. Through a review of case studies and industry reports, this article highlights the benefits and challenges associated with adopting composable BPM architecture, particularly in fast-paced industries such as finance, insurance, and retail. The research also examines how modular BPM components, such as case management, task automation, and decision services, can be orchestrated to create agile, scalable workflows. This article provides insights into how composable BPM can help organizations drive innovation, increase process efficiency, and achieve greater responsiveness to market dynamics. Ultimately, composable BPM architecture is poised to transform how businesses design and execute workflows, enabling them to stay competitive in a rapidly evolving business environment.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
References
van der Aalst, W. M. P., & ter Hofstede, A. H. M. (2005). "YAWL: Yet Another Workflow Language." Information Systems, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 245-275.
Leymann, F. (2005). "The (Service) Oriented Architecture." Proceedings of the 10th International EDOC Conference (EDOC'06), pp. 3-3.
Smith, H., & Fingar, P. (2003). "Business Process Management: The Third Wave." Meghan-Kiffer Press.
Weske, M. (2007). "Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures." Springer-Verlag.
Papazoglou, M. P., & van den Heuvel, W. J. (2007). "Service-Oriented Design and Development Methodology." International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 412-442.
Dumas, M., van der Aalst, W. M. P., & ter Hofstede, A. H. M. (2005). "Process-Aware Information Systems: Bridging People and Software Through Process Technology." John Wiley & Sons.
Schmidt, D. C. (2006). "Model-Driven Engineering." IEEE Computer, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 25-31.
Sadiq, S., & Orlowska, M. E. (2000). "Analyzing Process Models Using Graph Reduction Techniques." Information Systems, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 117-134.
Kumar, A., & Zhao, J. L. (1999). "Dynamic Routing and Operational Controls in Workflow Management Systems." Management Science, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 253-272.
Reijers, H. A., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2005). "The Effectiveness of Workflow Management Systems: Predictions and Lessons Learned." International Journal of Information Management, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 458-472.
Grefen, P., Aberer, K., Hoffner, Y., & Ludwig, H. (2000). "CrossFlow: Cross-Organizational Workflow Management in Dynamic Virtual Enterprises." Computer Systems Science and Engineering, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 277-290.
Jablonski, S., & Bussler, C. (1996). "Workflow Management: Modeling Concepts, Architecture, and Implementation." International Thomson Computer Press.
Georgakopoulos, D., Hornick, M., & Sheth, A. (1995). "An Overview of Workflow Management: From Process Modeling to Workflow Automation Infrastructure." Distributed and Parallel Databases, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 119-153.
van der Aalst, W. M. P., & Kumar, A. (2003). "XML-Based Schema Definition for Support of Interorganizational Workflow." Information Systems Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 23-46.
Mendling, J., Neumann, G., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2007). "Understanding the Occurrence of Errors in Process Models Based on Metrics." Proceedings of the OTM Confederated International Conferences "On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems", pp. 113-130.