Agricultural Robots for Harvesting and Planting
Main Article Content
Abstract
The agricultural sector is at the forefront of technological innovation, seeking sustainable solutions to address the increasing demand for food production in the face of population growth and environmental challenges. Agricultural robots have emerged as a transformative force, revolutionizing traditional farming practices, with a particular focus on harvesting and planting operations. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the current landscape of agricultural robots, exploring their applications, technological advancements, benefits, challenges, and prospects.
In recent years, the agricultural industry has witnessed a paradigm shift with the introduction of various types of robots designed to streamline and enhance harvesting and planting processes. These robots include drones equipped with advanced sensors, robotic arms for precise harvesting, and autonomous vehicles for efficient planting. The integration of these technologies aims to optimize resource utilization, reduce labour costs, and mitigate the environmental impact of farming practices.
Harvesting robots play a pivotal role in precision agriculture, employing technologies such as computer vision and machine learning to identify ripe crops and execute precise harvesting manoeuvres. Case studies showcasing successful implementations of robotic fruit and vegetable harvesting underscore the potential for increased efficiency and reduced post-harvest losses.
In the realm of planting, agricultural robots demonstrate their prowess through automated seeding and transplanting processes. These technologies contribute to precision planting, ensuring optimal spacing and depth for seeds, leading to improved crop yields. The paper delves into the specific applications and advancements in planting robots, losing light on their position in reshaping traditional planting methodologies.
Technological improvements in sensing and imaging technologies, in addition to navigation and control structures, were pivotal within the evolution of agricultural robots. Real-time records analysis the usage of sensors and cameras, coupled with self-reliant navigation structures, allows these robots to perform with a high diploma of precision, contributing to the general achievement of automatic farming structures.
While agricultural robots provide a myriad of benefits, consisting of extended productivity and reduced hard work costs, demanding situations persist. High preliminary expenses, ethical concerns, and the mixing with existing agricultural practices pose hurdles to large adoption. The paper severely examines these challenges, emphasizing the need for a holistic method to address financial, ethical, and social dimensions.
Looking forward, the future of agricultural robots holds thrilling possibilities. Emerging technology, which include the mixing of robotics with the Internet of Things (IoT) and the capability of swarm robotics, promise similarly advancements. The sustainability and environmental effect of those technology also are explored, with a focus on minimizing ecological footprints and selling eco-friendly agricultural practices.
In end, this studies paper affords a complete overview of the modern-day kingdom of agricultural robots in harvesting and planting operations. By inspecting the packages, blessings, challenges, and future possibilities, the paper contributes to the continued speak surrounding the integration of superior technology in agriculture, paving the manner for a extra sustainable and green destiny in meals production.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
References
R. K. Kaushik Anjali and D. Sharma, "Analyzing the Effect of Partial Shading on Performance of Grid
Connected Solar PV System", 2018 3rd International Conference and Workshops on Recent Advances and
Innovations in Engineering (ICRAIE), pp. 1-4, 2018.
Amaha, K., Shono, H., & Takakura, T. 1989. A harvesting robot of cucumber fruits. ASAE Paper No. 89-7053.
St. Joseph, MI: ASAE.
Arima, S., Kondo, N., & Monta, M. 2004. Strawberry harvesting robot on table-top culture. ASAE Paper No.
-3089. St. Joseph, MI: ASAE.
Åstrand, B., & Baerveldt, A. 2002. An agricultural mobile robot with vision-based perception for mechanical
weed control. Auton. Rob., 13, 21–35.
Benson, E., Reid, J., & Zhang, Q. 2003. Machine visionbased guidance system for an agricultural small-grain
harvester. Trans. ASAE, 464, 1255–1264.
Brown, G.K. 2002. Mechanical harvesting systems for the Florida citrus juice industry. ASAE Paper No. 02-
St. Joseph, MI: ASAE.
Burks, T., Villegas, F., Hannan, M., Flood, S., Sivaraman, B., Subramanian, V., & Sikes, J. 2005. Engineering
and horticultural aspects of robotic fruit harvesting: Opportunities and constraints. HortTecnhology, 151, 79–87.
Van Henten E J, Hemming J, Van Tuijl B A J, Kornet J G, Meuleman J, Bontsema J, Van Os E A. An autonomous
robot for harvesting cucumbers in greenhouses. Autonomous Robots, 2002; 13(3): 241-258.
Tang X, Zhang T, Liu L, Xiao D, Chen Y. A new robot system for harvesting cucumber. Proceedings in
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting, 2009; pp.3873–3885.
Van Henten E J, van Tuijl B A J, Hemming J, Kornet J G, Bontsema J, Van Os E A. Field test of an autonomous
cucumber picking robot. Biosyst. Eng., 2003; 86(3): 305–313.
Van Henten E J, Hemming J, Van Tuijl B A J, Kornet J G, Bontsema J. Collision-free motion planning for a
cucumber picking robot. Biosyst. Eng., 2003; 86(2): 135–144.
Van Henten E J, Schenk E J, van Willigenburg L G, Meuleman J, Barreiro P. Collision-free inverse kinematics
of the redundant seven-link manipulator used in a cucumber picking robot. Biosyst. Eng., 2010; 106(2): 112–124.
Van Henten E J, Van’t Slot D A, Hol C W J, Van Willigenburg L G. Optimal manipulator design for a cucumber
harvesting robot. Comput. Electron. Agric., 2009; 65(2): 247–257.
Underwood J P, Hung C, Whelan B, Sukkarieh S. Mapping almond orchard canopy volume, flowers, fruit and
yield using LiDAR and vision sensors. Comput. Electron. Agric., 2016; 130: 83–96.