The Effect of Financial Compensation and Work Stress on the Job Satisfaction of Go- Jek (Go-Ride) Driver Partners in Bandung Area in the Covid-19 Pandemic

This study aims to determine the effect of Financial Compensation and Work Stress on The Work Satisfaction of the Go-jek Driver Partners (go-ride) Bandung Area in the Covid-19 Pandemic both partially and simultaneously. The research method used is the descriptive and verificative method with data collection using field research and literature research. The population in this study is the driver-partner of PT GO-JEK Indonesia Central Bandung Region. The sample used as many as 115 respondents. Based on the results of the analysis concluded that: 1) there is a significant influence together (simultaneously) of financial compensation and work stress on the job satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners. 2) Financial compensation affects the variable Job satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners. If the financial compensation is getting better, then the job satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners will increase, as well as if the financial compensation gets worse than the job satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners will decrease. 3) Work stress has a significant and negative effect on the variable Work satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners. If work stress increases, it will decrease the job satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners. Likewise, if work stress decreases it will increase the job satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners.


Introduction
Human resources in a corporate organization is an inseparable entity. The organization of the company can run following the expectations if there are human beings who have the same goal that is to make the organization where he works and make a living it can experience an increase in profits and development every year. 1 *Didi Tarmidi, 2 Rismauli Simbolon, 3 Wisnu Astawa Putra, 4 Andi Rahman Sulaeman and 5 Mochamad Farhan

Financial compensation
Financial compensation according to Rivai and Sagala (2016) is a reward given by the company to employees in the form of money.

Work stress
According to Anoraga (2014), work stress is a form of one's response, both physical and mental to a change in his environment that is perceived to be disruptive and results in him being threatened.

Job satisfaction
According to Rivai (2015), job satisfaction is an evaluation that describes a person for feeling happy or unhappy, satisfied or dissatisfied at work. According to Rivai (2015) states that according to the Job Descriptive Index (JDI) the cause of satisfaction factor is 1) working in the right place, 2) the appropriate payment, 3) Organization and management, 4) supervise on the right job, and 5) the person who is in the right job.

Research conceptual framework and hypothesis development
In line with the frame of thought, in conducting this study the author formulated the hypothesis of submission as follows: H1: There is an effect of financial compensation on job satisfaction H2: There is an Effect of Work Stress on Job Satisfaction H3: There is an effect of financial compensation and work stress on job satisfaction

Methods
The method used by the authors is the descriptive and verificative research method. To find out the effect of financial compensation and work stress on job satisfaction. The research data obtained is processed and analyzed quantitatively. A quantitative approach is a research method based on the philosophy of positivism, used to research a particular population or sample (Sugiyono, 2018). With statistics test, it can be known the Effect of Financial Compensation and Work Stress on Job Satisfaction.

Population
According to Sugiyono (2017), the definition of population is a generalized area consisting of objects or subjects of certain characteristics set by researchers to be studied and then drawn conclusions. So in this study the population is the driver partner of PT GO-JEK Indonesia Central Bandung Region.

Samples
According to Sugiyono (2017), samples are part of the number and characteristics that the population has. This sampling must be done in such a way that the sample can function or can describe the actual state of the population, therefore the sample that must be taken from the population must be truly representative (representative). The minimum number of samples used in this study was 115 respondents.

Data collection techniques
Data collection techniques are ways that are done for. obtain the necessary data and information in the research (Sugiyono, 2017). The data collection techniques performed by the authors in this study are using field research and literature research.

Results and Discussion
The results of data obtained from 100 respondents showed the results obtained are as follows:

Validity test
The results of the Validity Test of this study are as follows:

Reliability test
Reliability tests are conducted to show the extent to which a measurement result is relatively consistent when measuring against the same aspect on the same measuring instrument. A set of questions to measure a variable is said to be reliable and successfully measures the variable we measure if its reliable coefficient is greater than or equal to 0.6 (> 0.60).  Based on Table 6, the calculation result of the correlation coefficient (R) is 0.616. The value is between the value of 0.60 -0.799 meaning Financial compensation (X1) and Work stress (X2) have a strong relationship with the job satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners (Variable Y).

Coefficient of determination
From Table 6, it is known that the coefficient of determination is 0.380 or 38.0%, meaning that the variables financial compensation (X1) and Work stress (X2) have an influence on the job satisfaction of GO-JEK driverpartners (Variable Y) of 38.0% and the remaining 61.0% influenced by other factors.

Partial hypothesis testing
First Hypothesis H0:  < 0, means that there is no effect between financial compensation on the job satisfaction of GO-JEK driver partners. H1:  > 0, means that there is an effect of financial compensation on the job satisfaction of GO-JEK driverpartners.  Table 7, it can be concluded that the value of things (8,321) > ttable (1,658) and significance value of 0.000 < 0.05 means, Ho is rejected. Thus the variable Financial compensation (X1) affects the variable Job satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners (Variable Y). If the financial compensation is getting better, then the job satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners will increase, as well as if the financial compensation gets worse than the job satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners will decrease. From Table 8, it can be concluded that the value tcount (8,244) > ttable (1,658) and significance value 0.000 < 0.05 means, Ho is rejected. Thus the variable Work stress (X2) affects the variable Job satisfaction of go-jek driver-partners (Variable Y). If work stress increases, it will decrease the job satisfaction of GO-JEK driverpartners. Likewise, if work stress decreases it will increase the job satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners.

Simultaneous hypothesis testing (F test)
To be able to know the effect of financial compensation and work stress on the work satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners simultaneously, it is necessary to test hypotheses where the results can be obtained in the following table:

Specify F count
From Table 9, it can be seen that the value of Fcount (34,331) > Ftable (3,232) then H0 is rejected and H1 is received which means that there is a significant influence together (simultaneously) of financial compensation (Variable X1) and Work Stress (Variable X2) on the work satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners (Variable Y).

Results and Discussion
Based on the results of the determination test in table 6 it is known that the coefficient of determination is 0.380 or 38.0%, meaning that the variables Financial compensation (X1) and Work stress (X2) influence the job satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners (Variable Y) of 38.0% and the remaining 61.0% influenced by other factors.
In the results of the second hypothesis test against work stress (X2), tcount value (8,244) >ttable (1,658) and significance value of 0.000 < 0.05 means, Ho was rejected and H1 was accepted. Thus the variable Financial compensation (X1) Work stress (X2) affects the variable Job satisfaction of go-jek driver-partners (Variable Y).
Then in the last part through the hypothesis test simultaneously obtained the value of Fcount (34,331) > Ftable (3,232) then H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted which means there is a significant influence together (simultaneously) of financial compensation (Variable X1) and Work Stress (Variable X2) on the job satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners (Variable Y).

Conclusion
Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded as follows: 1. Based on the results of the study shows that there is a significant influence together (simultaneous) of financial compensation and work stress on the job satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners. 2. Financial compensation affects the variable Work satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners. If the financial compensation is getting better, then the job satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners will increase, as well as if the financial compensation gets worse than the job satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners will decrease. 3. Work stress has a significant and negative effect on the variable Work satisfaction of GO-JEK driverpartners. If work stress increases, it will decrease the job satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners. Likewise, if work stress decreases it will increase the job satisfaction of GO-JEK driver-partners.