Librarians Skills and Competencies for Scholarly Communication and Repository Management in Nigeria

The rapid change in scholarly communication and knowledge management has transformed the repository services and imposed new skills and competencies for repository management. This study is posed to assess the skills and competencies of librarians for repository management and scholarly communication in academic institutions in Nigeria. The study adopted a survey research design to assess the skills and competencies of the librarians using NASIG “Core Competencies for Scholarly Communication Librarians 2017”. The sample size of the study comprises 120 librarians across 40 institutions. The findings of the study indicate among others that; 74 % of the librarians have a general understanding of repository platforms, 54.17% background knowledge of open access movement, and 58% experience in advocacy for open access. At the same time, 83.3% of the librarians can capture, store, and preserve the research output. While 62.3% understand research impact, only 35.8% understand emerging alternatives measures of the impact. Although, 73.1 % understand Data description and storage, only 20.8% understand text and data mining. The study concluded that awareness, skills, and competencies of the librarians is increasing and recommends among others; setting up a framework for the employment of repository and scholarly communication librarians and training on repository management and scholarly communication.


North american serials interest group (nasig) "core competencies for scholarly communication".
As an independent organization saddled with the responsibility of transforming the management of information resources, NASIG was formed to smoothen and enhance the dissemination, acquisition and sustain access to all forms of information resources.
In a bid to harmonize complete areas of prerequisite skills and competencies for scholarly communication librarian (SCL), NASIG developed a framework that identified essential skills and competencies for SCL giving emphasis to "institutional repository management", "publishing services", "copyright services", "data management services" and "assessment and impact metrics". The framework was developed out of investigation and deliberations led by NASIG "Scholarly Communication Core Competencies Task Force". The framework was found worthy of consideration in this study because it incorporates all the areas identified in the competencies for scholarly communication, open-access competencies profile for research data management (Wesolek et al., 2017).   (2017b) showed that there is inadequate knowledge and skills in developing standard interface and providing effective user information needs for achieving the best practice of institutional repository in Nigeria. lack of chances for in-depth training deprived librarians to gain new competencies and re-tool themselves with skills to meet the current demands (Rodriguez, 2015).
Based on the needs for identification of skills and competencies for scholarly communication librarian, NASIG developed a framework that includes core competencies of scholarly communication librarians 2017, to guide librarians on the areas of the prerequisite skills and competencies to meet the current demands of scholarly communication (Wesolek et al.,2017).

Methodology
The study adopted a survey research design to assess the skills and competencies of the librarians in Nigeria using NASIG Core Competencies for "scholarly communication "Librarians 2017. The sample size of the study comprises 120 academic librarians. Purposive sampling techniques was used in selecting 3 librarians working as repository's managers, e-librarians, reference librarians and scholarly communication related positions across 40 institutions in Nigeria. Online survey was developed using the core competencies identified by NASIG, 2017. The survey was administered the respondents using their personal emails, and WhatsApp accounts. The data was collected between March -August 2019.

Findings and Discussion
Out of the 120 respondents, 29.17 % were female, 70.83% were male working as librarians at the repository and scholarly communicationrelated positions in across 40 institutions in Nigeria. On the other hand, 60% of the respondents have master's degrees as their highest qualification while 25% have bachelor's degree, 9 % have Ph.D. 3.6% and 4.8% have Diploma and certificate as their highest qualification respectively.
With regards to background knowledge, the result on table 2 shows that 65% of respondents understand digital preservation and copyright, and 54.17 % are knowledgeable about open access movement and its impact on scholarly communication. On technical skills, it can be observed that, majority of the respondents (74%) have experience on repository platform. While, half (50%) of them have skills on data management solution, only 20% have expertise on digital object types and format, OPAC, e-classification and cataloging process. Despite having low responses on faculty profiling systems, digital collections and it's technical aspect, the findings corroborate with Okeji, Eze, and Chibueze (2019) on the experience in repository platforms, that librarians understand and use "repository platforms" for arching their publications in Nigeria.
Similarly, the result also shows that, librarians have experience on outreach and instruction as 58% of the respondents declared having experience in advocacy for open access, andinstruction in areas of scholarly communication literacy for both faculty members and students, 64%, indicated having experience in educating individuals on effective ways to navigate, evaluate, and contributing to the scholarly conversation.In spite of having significant number of respondents (76.6%, 54% & 51.6%) with experience in direct supervision of staffs to effectively carry out their assigned duties, managing projects to leverage on the expertise of other librarians and scholars, and building cross-departmental teams respectively, only 15% of the respondnets can Liaise with faculties on collection development and instruction in area of scholarly communication.
In the area of publishing services (Table 3), it can be observed that, 58.3% and 56.6% of the respondents have the ability to collect and disseminate assessment metrics and ability to provide technical support on publishing services. Similarly, 44.4%, 33.3%, 21.6%, and 15% possessbasic knowledge of relevant metadata schemata, have experience in the full life cycle of publishing, and ability to perform system administration and programming, andexperience of minting identifiers respectively.  Responses frequency (RF) on institutional repository management in table 3 indicates that, 83.3% and 55% of the respondents can collect, store, and preserve research output and develop policies. As only 5% can report statistics in support of outreach and education, less than 50% percent of the respondents have knowledge and ability to apply publisher policies on archiving, experience of repository solutions, and ability to apply metadata schemata. It can be seen from table 3 that, 75.8 % of the respondents understand the author's rights, and 64.1% have Knowledge of relevant national copyright law. However, less than 50% have the ability of handling permission requests, knowledge of campus copyright policies, awareness of the judicial environment, and ability to perform licensing services.
Responses on data management services were remarkable as 73.1%, 53.3% and 50% of the respondents have knowledge on data description and storage, collection development, organization ofand access to third-party data sets and knowledge on data management planning respectively.At the same time, 34.1%, 32.5%, and 20.8% of the respondents have knowledge of and experience in open source and hosted data repository solutions, knowledge of and ability to apply funder mandates related to data storage, access and retention and knowledge of text and data mining, awareness of the licensing requirementsand application of copyright law respectively. The finding has shown incredible development in terms of data management services from the findings of Gbaje et al. (2017) which indicated that a low percentage of librarians had an understanding of data management activities in Nigeria.
From assessment and impact metrics, it can be realized that, Even though, only 35% and 40.83 of the respondents understand emerging alternative measures of research impact and knowledge of faculty activity reporting systems, 62.5%, 55% and 50% of the respondents understand the indicators of research impact, their strengths, and limitations, can assess journal for impact and evidence of publication rigor and have knowledge of faculty profile systems and academic social networks respectively. These findings established a significant level of awareness on assessment and impact metrics by librarians in Nigeria. Although the findings supports Gbaje et al. (2017) findings that, librarians lack knowledge on altimetry practices, it has shown improvement in terms of assessment of journal for impact and knowledge of faculty profile systems.

Conclusion and Recommendation
With 65 % of respondents understand digital preservation and copyright, 74% have experience on repository platforms, 83.3% can collect, store, and preserve research output of the institutions and develop policies, 75.8 % understand author's rights, 72.5%, have knowledge on data description and storage, and 62.5%, understand the indicators of research impact, their strengths, and limitations, it can be concluded that through awareness, skills, and competencies of librarians in Nigerian institutions is increasing accumulatively in the above-mentioned areas. However, there is need for improvement in the areas of metadata schema and standards, legislative and judicial publishing environments, technical skills such as e-cataloging and classification, liaising with faculty in area of scholarly communication, experience with repository solutions, application of mandates issued by research funders, faculty profiling systems and understanding of emerging alternative measures of research impacts.
The study recommends that, Nigerian institutions should send librarians for training on scholarly communication and repository management, with emphasis on data management, metrics assessment, repository policy, campus copyright, and license services. Similarly, Library schools should review their curriculums to include current trends on scholarly communication for librarians as well as set up a framework for the employment of repository and scholarly communication librarians. Finally, librarians should continue to attend training and workshops for capacity building on repository management and scholarly communication.